Advertisements

Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Socialism’

Abraham Lincoln’s Strangely Socialist State of the Union Speech

September 3, 2012 1 comment

Happy Labor Day!

It’s not really socialist. There is just no way a modern president could make these sort of remarks in a modern SOTU address.

Abraham Lincoln, Dec. 13, 1861 excerpt:

It is not needed nor fitting here that a general argument should be made in favor of popular institutions, but there is one point, with its connections, not so hackneyed as most others, to which I ask a brief attention. It is the effort to place capital on an equal footing with, if not above, labor in the structure of government. It is assumed that labor is available only in connection with capital; that nobody labors unless somebody else, owning capital, somehow by the use of it induces him to labor. This assumed, it is next considered whether it is best that capital shall hire laborers, and thus induce them to work by their own consent, or buy them and drive them to it without their consent. Having proceeded so far, it is naturally concluded that all laborers are either hired laborers or what we call slaves. And further, it is assumed that whoever is once a hired laborer is fixed in that condition for life.

Now there is no such relation between capital and labor as assumed, nor is there any such thing as a free man being fixed for life in the condition of a hired laborer. Both these assumptions are false, and all inferences from them are groundless.

Labor is prior to and independent of capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.

The last sentence in the speech is, “With a reliance on Providence all the more firm and earnest, let us proceed in the great task which events have devolved upon us.” That’s how Abraham Lincoln said, “God Bless America.” Compare that shit to Obama’s 2012 SOTU style. Oh, how times have changed.

 

Advertisements

Webcomic Wednesday

From Natalie Dee.

Gah, I can’t take the stupid! Obama and Socialism. *headdesk*

Good morning.  It’s 11:38 AM.  I fell asleep at 7 AM.   I am tired and cranky and would like to raise a hefty middle finger to the Drudge Report, which has been increasingly pissing me off since its posting about the crazy, attention-seeking chick with the backwards B carved into her face.

It is no surprise that a week before the election is the appropriate time for the Marxism rhetoric.  Because tying Obama to the name of a man who died long before industrial capitalism was effectively replaced by finance capitalism is now the most effective way to propagate fear, since calling him a Muslim obviously wasn’t working.

All reasonable onlookers of Drudge’s latest headline —  2001 OBAMA: TRAGEDY THAT 'REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH' NOT PURSUED BY SUPREME COURT —  say, wtf, Matt Drudge, what is this bullshit.

The video in scrutiny shows, quote Huffington Post, “Barack Obama in law professor mode discussing the limitations of the court and his belief that the legislative process is the appropriate way to pursue economic justice. (Which if memory serves – accords with the conservative preference to eliminate judges who legislate from the bench.)”

My favorite gay, libertarian blogger says, “He was making a case against using courts to implement broad social goals – which is, last time I checked, the conservative position.”

Yes, Obama is a socialist.  Because progressive taxation is totally the slippery slope to replacing private means of production.  Yay labour theory of value!  Boo marginal utility!   Most people have no idea what I’m talking about because most people can neither define nor spell proletariat.

God forbid we become a “socialist country much like Sweden,” the country with world’s highest democracy index, which ranks higher than the United States in per capita GDP, literacy rates, life expectancy, and oh– happiness.

Fuck you, Matt Drudge.  Fuck you.