Advertisements

Archive

Archive for the ‘Social commentary’ Category

The Sims Social Addicts Anonymous or: How a Facebook Game Ate my Life

September 24, 2011 4 comments

Remember a couples weeks ago, when I said I wasn’t going to talk about the Facebook Sims ever again? I lied.

I was going to stop playing once I made a fourth room to my house. I was going to stop once I built the double bed, so my Sim could “WooHoo!” with his girlfriend.  I was going to stop after the BigScreen TV, the Writer skill-up to Level 10, and the Pink Lawn Flamingos.  But I couldn’t stop.  I couldn’t stop the Sims cycle of addiction.

Now, I’m just confirming what we all already know.  Video games are just as rewarding to the brain, if not moreso than real life.

I mean, when you mow your Sim lawn, money pops out!  Money!  And it makes a poppy noise! And then a jingly money noise when you collect it. I’d be mowing my lawn everyday if that happened in real life.

I’m the only person among my friends to make a black Sim.  I don’t understand why everyone else tried to make a close-approximation real life version of themselves. How boring. Reginald Omar Klein is a pimp and that’s why his house has house has purple walls.

Also, purple is the black power color.

Reginald Omar Klein wants you to come over and visit, subvert the government, smoke a doobie (not a real Sim option), and WooHoo! in his shower.  Come. Come join us at Sims Social.  And you too can have an addiction to purchasing pink lawn flamingos.

(Actually, I think I think I’ve run out of space to build stuff. This is like that time I ran out of levels in Angry Birds. Addiction over!)

Advertisements

An Open Letter to Netflix: Stop this “Qwikster” Bullshit

September 21, 2011 2 comments

Update: Netflix Scraps Qwikster DVD-only Service Idea

9/21/2011

Dear Board of Chairmen at Netflix,

Last November, when you launched your $7.99 unlimited streaming plan, DVDs by mail was treated as a $2 add-on to your unlimited streaming plan. Since your July announcement of price increased and from when the new prices went into effect–Unlimited Streaming for $7.99 a month and/or 1 DVD at a time for $7.99 a month–you lost 1,000,000 subscribers. Your stocks now look like crap.

You then release a memo in your blog, “An Explanation and Some Reflections.”  Your attempt to placate your obviously pissed-off customers went as follows:

It is clear from the feedback over the past two months that many members felt we lacked respect and humility in the way we announced the separation of DVD and streaming, and the price changes. That was certainly not our intent, and I offer my sincere apology… When Netflix is evolving rapidly, however, I need to be extra-communicative. This is the key thing I got wrong.

This blog post was signed Reed Hastings, Co-Founder and CEO, Netflix.  You should fire him, because he’s an idiot.

We don’t give a shit about the level of communication in announcing the separation of streaming and DVDs. We like streaming and would be willing to pay the increased fees if your service was more competitive than other services avaialbe. But you just lost your Starz contract and all the movies that went with it. Your streaming service is not “evolving;” it just got worse and you’re charging more for it, in the middle of an economic stagnation no less.

So for you to complicate the situation even more by announcing you will re-branding the DVD service to a separate website called “Qwikster” demonstrates a severe lack in ability to respond to consumer wants and needs. It’s like selling fruits and vegetables and then making another store with another name (but it’s a subsidiary!) to sell just the fruit. It doesn’t make sense for you or your customers.

You said in your blog, “Companies rarely die from moving too fast, and they frequently die from moving too slowly.”  Well, companies also die from a common business practice known as “sucking at life.”  Refer to Wikipedia’s List of Businesses that Failed, and be prepared when you join that list.

One business analyst compared your business plan to Apple’s iPod, suggesting that this business gamble will have long-term benefits for your profits. He’s also an idiot. The iPod is a technologically superior product in its field with aesthetics, durability, and easy to use feature. But streaming movies and TV shows is a pretty standard service that has competition coming from everywhere.

Also, next time you decide hike your prices, we’re going to remember your blog post and quote you: “There are no pricing changes (we’re done with that!)” “Done” with price increases? Really? For how long?

I guess as long as it takes for Redbox and Hulu to undercut you.

Sincerely,

Your Pissed-off Customers


Netflix doesn’t have an e-mail address.

But you can call their customer service at: 1-866-716-0414
(Be nice to the techs, though. It’s not their fault.)

And you can write to them:

Netflix, Inc.
100 Winchester Circle
Los Gatos, CA 95032

On Feminism and Gender Egalitarianism

August 25, 2011 5 comments

My post “SlutWalk NYC is pissing me off with its DSK protesting” is getting a fair number of hits from a Tumblr post that calls it, a “terrible post snarking on Slutwalk NYC organizers for protesting the dismissal of charges against DSK.”  (If only I had AdSense, they’d be making me money. That’d be satisfying.)  Mostly I was commenting on the accusatory rhetoric of the event’s Facebook page, which rifled my general sense of justice.

The post wasn’t all that snarky, considering snark is an intrinsic style of the blog, and my responses to the lady commenter were pretty tame.  I’m usually not very kind to people who don’t have their reality in the upright and locked position, but she was doing a good job of characterizing her own crazy.

—-

To preface this post’s main points, I want to note that I’m very familiar with feminism.  I attended a formerly all-women’s college soon after it went co-ed in an area with a strong sense of women’s studies, where I served as the Women’s Resource Center liaison to the Health Center.  I consider myself a strong gender egalitarian and if it wasn’t obvious from the rest of my blog, my politics are liberal and supportive of individual rights.

I also don’t want to debate the semantics of “feminism” since there have been so many differing women’s rights organizations and sub-cultures, so I just want to clarify I’m referring the general social movement that promotes gender egalitarianism under the presumption that women’s freedoms have been historically suppressed.

I do identify as a feminist, but when describing myself as such, I normally add a clarifying sentence involving the word “gender egalistarianism” after it.  And here’s why:  In feminism, as in every progressive movement, there will be extremists with whom mainstreamists will be reluctant to associate themselves.  I believe that there are feminists with reasonable expectations of society and there are also (characterization of a small minority) the belligerent misandrists who honestly feel that the collective male zeitgeist is consciously trying to impose its giant phallus on all their childhood hopes and dreams.

The best analogy I can think of for this reluctance to associate with the word “feminism,” despite its positive past, would be “animal activism.”  Certainly I feel passionately about animal rights, but some of PETA’s hypocrisy and ALF’s blatant terrorism makes me want to go all Jon Stewart and scream at the self-declared activists:   Stop, stop hurting America.

I don’t want spend a lot of time delineating what I deem “reasonable expectations” for feminism, but I think that the first step in an honest conversation about women’s rights is agreeing that the goals of First Wave feminism have largely been met, at least in the US and Industrialized Europe.

Yes, sexism still exists.  It should be handled seriously and on a case-by-case basis.  I believe, much to some libertarians’ chagrin, anti-discrimination laws are generally a good idea and should be enforced when violations occur.

Stereotypes also exist. Some of them are funny. Some of them contain statistical truths. Some of them create preconceptions in a society that can result in unfair treatment.  Again, stereotypes and sexist jokes are things that don’t necessarily normalize or condone societal injustice and should be judged on a case-by-case basis.

This doesn’t mean progressive movements should cease their work or that I feel that feminist is a shameful title.  But for gender egalitarianism to exist properly there needs to be an open dialogue about men’s rights, and this is something that I’ve found to be lost in women-oriented gender studies.

The collaborative writing project No, Seriously, What About Teh Menz, has some pretty good posts on male-centered sexism that I would recommend as good gender-issues reading.

As a feminist, I feel that the best ways I can promote gender egalitarianism are:  Vocalizing about sexism when I see it, supporting and promoting women’s reproductive rights and LGBT causes, being knowledgeable and active in political issues, and setting a strong role for myself in academics and work as an example of a confident, independent-minded women.

And to the misogynists, the misandrists, and the gynocentrists that completely ignore male issues: Stop, Stop Hurting Feminism.

SlutWalk NYC is pissing me off with its DSK protesting

August 22, 2011 12 comments
Slutwalk Toronto via Wikipedia

Slutwalk Toronto via Wikipedia.

I though the concept of Slutwalk was cool when I first heard about it.  Taking back derogatory terms for sexual liberalization?  Awesome!  Sign me up for SlutWalk NYC for October 1.  I also followed them on Tumblr to remind myself of the date and get updates of any changes.

But I was not happy to receive an invite to the Dominuque Strauss-Kahn Protest, which seemingly presumes his guilt in the sexual assault case and labels the accuser as “the victim.”   Slutwalk’s characterization that DSK was treated lightly by the press this whole time is wrong.  Their claim that DSK paid people off for character assassination of the victim is unfounded.  They cited no evidence in that claim, presented  no rebuttals to all the contradicting evidence, and are walking on a dangerous presumption of guilt that is against the spirit of our entire legal system.

Reuters’ Anya Schiffrin makes excellent points in her blog about other organizations presenting their visceral emotional reactions rather than talking about the facts:

Much of the reporting has been done in haste and that’s too bad. One example was The New York Times’ piece on the sexist culture of the IMF which conflated  rape, sexual harassment and work place discrimination against women with the mundane subject of  affairs at the office.  By combining these four different subjects, the Times muddied the subject without adding much to our understanding.

By creating this fringe protest, SlutWalk NYC is undermining both its credibility and primary objectives.  A single court case with dubious evidence is hardly a paradigm of “rape culture” worthy of a protest.

I hope SlutWalk’s home-based Toronto organization doesn’t associate itself with its New York City satellite organization’s poor choice in politics.

[Edit:  I wrote a related post, On Feminism and Gender Egalitarianism, partially as a response to comments below. And another post commenting upon a race-issues blog which criticized a sign at Slutwalk NYC.]

On “epic” and “fail” and the English language.

via The Best Page in the Universe

Oh no! 4chan slang has permeated the zeitgeist. Whatever shall we do?

Despite what you may have thought from this post’s title and my utterly sexy command of the syntax and mechanics of the English language, I am writing today to defend the use of these fail-chan spawned, meme-generating words.

Indeed, I am guilty of slipping out an “epic” or a “fail” in my real life speech–evidence that the semantics of these units of language have transgressed their e-print abode, and 4chan deserves a note in the OED.

What makes me not an asshole is that I don’t deign to believe that my usage of these words is witty or original. It’s when you start posting terrible one-liners on forums using these bastardizations of the English language like you’re the funniest person in the world that you become that person no one likes.

People also don’t like anal-retentive nitpickers. Fail Blog is popular for a reason. Get over it, you English elitists.

I got 2K hits because you are all terrible people.

Around 4 AM last night/this morning I made a post while half lucid on ambien about Amy Winehouse.  By noon it had nearly a thousand hits.

The top search engine results are from Google UK, you wankers.  As of right now, the top terms used to find me were:

amy winehouse jokes 1,011
amy winehouse dead jokes 156
amy winehouse death jokes 139

I think many people were disappointed I didn’t actually have a list of Amy Winehouse jokes other than that one. So, by popular demand:

  • Elton John will perform at Amy Winehouse’s funeral with a beautiful rendition of Candle Under The Spoon.
  • Amy Winehouse walks into a bar.  The bartender walks over and says, “Sorry, we don’t serve spirits in here.”
  • Amy Winehouse’s manager is said to be unfazed by the news of her death.  He said, “I’m not sure it’ll make much difference to her performance.”
  • What was Amy Winehouse’s biggest hit?   Her last one.

And since we’re all horrible human beings:   Amy Winehouse–she took more shots in her arm than a Norwegian youth camp.  (Where’s your Thor now?)

Leave yours in the comments.

Too soon? Why I laugh at Amy Winehouse jokes.

[edit: Follow-up post with the actual list of Amy Winehouse jokes.]

My friend on FB had a status update:  “They tried to make me go to rehab, but I said, thud.”  I pointed my e-thumbs up because it was funny.

I, of course, didn’t know Amy Winehouse personally.  I thought Back to Black was a great album and she had some killer hair.  But in response to this news,  I felt nothing.  No other thoughts than “Oh, that’s interesting. I bet the media is going to treat this like MJ lite.”  Is this because where my heart  is supposed to be is a cruel, atheistic black hole for compassion rendering me incapable of ever feeling sad about the death of another human being?

No, it’s because there’s not that much all surprising about her death.  Her battle with drugs and being a general screw-up were pretty public.  The media portrayal of her drunken, coked out antics may or may not be fair, but they were made amusing by the fact that she made a hit single based solely about refusing to get help and she did indeed have funny hair.

Meanwhile, while something terrifying, with a sweeping death toll 90x greater than that of one coked out celebrity,  happens to a peaceful and industrialized nation, the mainstream media blinks and scratches its nuts in confusion.  “Well, that there is a magnitude of infinite tragedy, but there are more interesting questions to answer.  Like at what point in Winehouse’s career did she let the booing her drunk ass offstage upbraid her fragile psyche?”

Anecdotes are the primary emotional knee-jerk rebuke to responses like mine.  Tear-jerkers about how your ex-roommate’s mom was a hot mess with a tragic death.  But Amy Winehouse wasn’t that person; she probably didn’t even know who you are.  So let the public figures have their public ridicule.  She can’t be hurt anymore.