Advertisements

Archive

Archive for the ‘Social commentary’ Category

AMERICAblog: Why the Family Research Council is a Hate Group

August 19, 2012 4 comments

We all know that the Chick-fil-A last month was public relations nightmare, with their donations to the SPLC-defined “hate group” the Family Research Council being the cherry on the scandal.

The Family Research Council is one of those groups that lobby Washington to force “Judeo-Christian” values down our throats via legislation. And gets pissed off when people criticize them, because they don’t understand the First Amendment.

AMERICAblog has an excellent post about how terrible the FRC really is:

Let me give you a made-up example of a quote about gays to who you how [sic] the family research council did this.

“This study looked at 45 gay men, and 35 lesbians.  It was clear from the subjects that gay men and lesbians face greater societal pressures in their day to day lives… which makes gays and lesbians much more likely to rip the heads off small bunnies.”

Wow, rip the heads off small bunnies – that’s pretty bad.  But hey, it’s a real study in a real journal, so it has to be true.  Except of course that the real quote from the actual study ends at the ellipse, while the FRC added its own opinion after the ellipse, while “forgetting” to put the end quote, so it looks like the FRC’s opinion is part of the official quote from the reputable study.

Gosh, I wonder how that happened?

It went on and on like this, through hundreds of footnotes.  I went through the original research of the various studies they cited and found that the study reached no such conclusion like the FRC claimed it did.  And on and on and on.

These are not honest people simply expressing a contrarian view of politics, like Democrats and Republicans do every day in Washington.

Tony Perkins, FRC’s head, got on TV a few months ago to debate whether gay parents were as good as straight parents.  Perkins said “no,” and he had the study to prove it.  Perkins explained how studies have proven that kids need a mom and a dad.  What Perkins didn’t bother telling you was that those studies compared kids with a mom and a dad to kids with a single parent.  The studies never looked at the relative merits of gay parents.  Gay parents might have been just as good, or heck, even better than straight parents.  The study didn’t even look at it.  But Perkins cited the study as proof that straight parents were better than gay parents, when the study had nothing to do with it.

And again, Dana, if you actually go through the FRC’s “research,” you will find this kind of “mistake” happening again and again.  It happens so often, it’s happened for twenty years now that I’ve been tracking them, that you come to realize that lying for the Family Research Council isn’t a flaw, it’s a feature.

I don’t really have strong opinions about the shooting and whether it should be called a “hate crime” or not, since I’m not for criminalizing reasons behind intent. But if FRC isn’t classified as a hate group, then I don’t know what should be.

Advertisements

IOC Androgen Rules Unfairly Target “Manly” Female Athletes

August 7, 2012 1 comment

Also cross-posted on The Feminine Miss Geek.

Caster Semenya, a track star who faced intense scrutiny in 2009 after allegations of being a man. -photo by Erik Van Leeuwen

The International Olympics Committee recently released a report titled,“IOC Regulations on Female Hyperandrogenism: Games of the XXX Olympiad in London, 2012,” which dictates that three doctors (a gynecologist ,a geneticist, and an endocrinologist) will get to decide if female athletes are actually female.

Sports is one of the very few remaining social structures where sex segregation and therefore sex testing is still generally acceptable. But the problem with these specific regulations is that they are based on faulty reasoning; there is no shortage of scientists that say testosterone levels are not the defining factor for being a woman, and there is no direct correlation between androgens and performance.

What’s more disturbing is that athletes can be singled out for additional medical testing simply for looking manly.

Via Suite 101:  

IOC Androgen Rules Unfairly Target “Manly” Female Athletes

Under this active policy, athletes legally living as women, but with naturally high testosterone, could be ineligible to compete in the Olympics. Moreover, anyone who deviates from the perceived norms of feminine characteristics could be subjected to additional medical testing as the report goes on to actively call for the National Olympic Committees to “actively investigate any perceived deviation in sex characteristics.”…

Genetic and bodily differences in sports are often obvious by sight: Gymnastics competitors have comparatively smaller frames than weightlifters. Taller women make better basketball players than short women. Michael Phelps has an unusually large torso and armspan, hypermobile joints, and is exceptionally close to the clinical levels of Marfan’s Syndrome.

There is no logically consistent reason to partition these genetic advantages from androgen levels and competitively strip a significant portion of female athletes their gender title.

The article gets more into citations from medical and ethical experts, saying the available scientific data does not back these IOC policies. If we must have two sex categories, then the process needs to be a more comprehensive process than three doctors comparing hormone levels to numbers on a chart.

And as far as I know, there are no policies for men that have “sub-male” levels testosterone. It’s a disturbingly unfair set of regulations that anyone caring about gender issues, sports, and basic fairness should complain about.

I’m not sure if this is the most direct way (comment if you have current contact info for the IOC), but the contact info for London Games-related complaints is:

“By phone
Call us on 0808 197 2012. Hours of operation are Monday to Sunday 9am–6pm.

By email
Email us at complaints@enquiries.london2012.com or by using the web form below.

In writing
Write to us at: Complaints, Communication and Public Affairs, The London 2012 Organising Committee, 23rd floor, 1 Churchill Place, London, E14 5LN.”

Read more at Suite101: IOC Androgen Rules Unfairly Target “Manly” Female Athletes | Suite101.com http://suite101.com/article/ioc-androgen-rules-unfairly-target-manly-female-athletes-a410665#ixzz22snZELIf

God Hates Figs

August 6, 2012 1 comment

Matthew 21:18-19

New International Version (NIV)

Jesus Curses a Fig Tree

18 Early in the morning, as Jesus was on his way back to the city, he was hungry. 19 Seeing a fig tree by the road, he went up to it but found nothing on it except leaves. Then he said to it, “May you never bear fruit again!” Immediately the tree withered.

—–

Guys, I think that using the NIV’s interpretation of the script we can put this Westboro Baptist shit to rest now. They just misread their own book. Honest mistake.

Any reasonable person would protest a soldier’s funeral or burn down a fig farm.

—–

Me, You, and Steve – Male versus Female Perspectives

Nerf Herder – Love Sandwich (2001)

 

Yeah you, and me, and Steve makes three
And Dave has got the video,
Dave has got the video

versus

Garfunkel and Oates – Me, You, and Steve (2011)

 

I could’ve wish a thousand wishes
For Steve to disappear
What the fuck’s your fucking problem?
Why he’s always here?

HBO’s “The Newsroom” Reportedly to Fire Half of their Writers

Aaron Sorkin, pushing the invisible “fire everybody on my writing staff (except my ex)” button.

So Aaron Sorkin is apparently just as big of a controlling dick as his character, Will McAvoy. Gotta take one to write one, I guess.

Via HuffPo:

The writers’ room at “The Newsroom” is going to look very different come Season 2. According to The Daily, creator Aaron Sorkin has reportedly fired the entirety of the show’s writing staff with the exception of ex-girlfriend Corinne Kinsbury.

separate report from EW cites a show insider who insists the layoffs aren’t quite so severe. “Every year each show reassesses the needs of its writing staffs,” HBO told EW in a statement. “This process is nothing out of the ordinary.”

I think it’s important to remember that even mostly consistently good writers are not infallible. Even Sorkin’s The West Wing started to fall off a bit in later seasons, and I still think that there were parts of The Social Network that were slow.

I hope he puts his hubris in check. Because I’m really enjoying “The Newsroom” and don’t want every character to end up as a phallus-shaped avatar of Sorkin.

Randolph, New Jersey Used by Bloomberg News as Example of an “Affluent” Town

CVS Parking Lot – Randolph, NJ

I grew up with one other sibling in a five-bedroom Colonial style house with a giant lawn and a stream in its backyard. It was on a cul-de-sac surrounded mostly by trees and other five-bedroom houses, which at the peak before the housing bubble collapse could have sold for around $800K each. The median household income of Randolph, NJ, according to latest census data, is around $100K. $150K for families. At times I felt like I was the only person in town who also didn’t own a pool or a dog.

In Middle School we would always joke about Randolph being a “boring, suburban hell” that just consisted of houses surrounded by houses surrounded by more houses. Today, Bloomberg News confirmed that that is exactly what my hometown is.

Bloomberg:  Americans Living Larger As New-Home Sizes Defy Economy

‎Randolph is the classic American exurb, with no real town center and one main state road lined with car dealerships and chain retail stores. Sport utility vehicle-driving consumers arrive in front of shops along Route 10 with the grim intensity of Marines charging into battle. The town’s Wikipedia profile waits until the fourth word to use the adjective ‘affluent.’

On Reddit’s quite hilarious map of New Jersey, Morris County is labeled as “Executives Living in Mansions, Driving Mercedes-Benzes.” I have to temper a bit and say that this isn’t an entirely accurate portrait; most of the executives actually drive BMWs.

Last week, when visiting, I was almost hit in a bank parking lot by a white Cadillac SUV driven by a soccer mom. Or maybe a field hockey mom, a lacrosse mom, or a band geek mom. It’s hard to tell who is who in this town.

Our town motto is “Where Life is Worth Living,” but my high school years (2003-2007) were rocked with scandal and tragedy. One of our cheerleaders who was at the Hula Bowl in Hawaii died when she fell, drunk and naked, out of a hotel balcony window. My freshman year algebra class was interrupted when my teacher was abruptly arrested for sleeping with a 16-year-old on the soccer team he coached. A year later, another teacher was arrested for sleeping with an 18-year-old student. Another year later, a girl who would have been a high school freshman was beaten and stabbed by her neighbor and had her body disassembled and nearly thrown off a bridge. The guy was caught and recently sentenced to life in prison.

Today, the single security guard has evolved into several security guards “Ram Guards” and once-open doors remain locked for security reasons during the day. People still talk of the 2008 Vermont post-prom trip where 110 RHS students were busted by the the cops.

Randolph High School was once the 32nd best public school in NJ, ranked by a 2006 issue of New Jersey Monthly. As the veteran teachers retired and the school grew overcrowded, tax-conscious Republican voters in New Jersey continued to support slashes in public school funding. RHS’s ranking dropped to 65nd best public school in 2008. It was still at 52nd in 2010.

This phenonemon of emphasizing individual achievement is not endemic to this town, but it’s a cultural attitude that permeates many of the well-educated and overworked of Morris County. Unfortunately, it is a myopic attitude that fails to see that public issues like lacks in school and library funding also take away in other personal wealth aspects like home property value.

I once heard a member of the Walsh family (who owns practically every bar in Morristown) say: “I’m just not in the right tax bracket to vote Democrat.” Considering that he’s from Mendham, the borough right next to Randolph which Republican Gov. Chris Christie is also from, I’m sure he is not alone in this sentiment.

Famous Randolphians include:

  • Chris Pennie, drummer for The Dillinger Escape Plan and Coheed and Cambria (lived in Lake Hopatcong, but went to RHS)
  • Antonio Cromartie and Drew Willy, professional football players.
  • Jon Hurwitz and Hayden Schlossberg, the writers of Harold and Kumar go to White Castle.
  • Greg Fields, a.k.a. IdrA, a professional Starcraft player who briefly lived in South Korea.

Randolph is still a nice town to own a home and raise a family in. It is boring, but there is a low crime rate and it has plenty of scenic parks in which to pass the time. You need a car to get around, but most people can afford it. As in most of Jersey, it’s only 20 minutes away from a nice mall. The lawns are green and mostly cut by Mexicans, but still lots of people own seated lawnmowers and cut their own lawns out of a personal sense of pride.

But as a twenty-something who spent her entire childhood in those lazy suburbs and wants to do something other than work at a pharmaceutical company and spend money, I’m still glad I moved to Brooklyn.

 

Men are NOT Raped More than Women in the US

[2013 edit: I realize that this post isn’t as clear in re: statistical analysis as I would like it to be. I doubt the premise will change, but I will do a more thorough data combing in a later post and link to it here in a edit when I do.]

[2016 edit: Here you go. “Men are NOT Raped More than Women in the US pt 2“]

Since I’ve been criticizing people that shit-talk men in my Cosmo post and my defense of DSK. I feel like I have to prove my gender egalitarianism now.

Progressive Current TV newscasters The Young Turks were straight up wrong about something last week. They called it a “fact.” I sent them an e-mail, but they never responded, so in my truth-crusading the need to bitch on my blog kicked in.

Dear Young Turks,

I’m writing in regards to your video “Men Raped More Than Women in US?” To your eponymous question, Cenk answered “yes” to men are raped more than women. This notion is simply wrong.

Cenk didn’t cite a statistic in the video, (which he should, if only to pass off blame in case the source is wrong) but the video comments cites Justice Department guidelines (but has no link).

You need to learn how to read and interpret primary sources before passing them off to your anchors as facts. Just because there are more men in prison than women, and there are prison rape epidemics, it does not immediately statistically necessitate that men are raped more than women.

Here is an excellent blog post from Feministe, which cites the Justice Dept. survey about prison sexual assault released in 2012:

The Justice Department survey is linked here. And… yeah. Those numbers are not quite correct, but they are nonetheless horrifying. First of all, “sexual assault” is not always the same as “rape,” and includes a variety of behavior that wouldn’t meet the legal standard for rape. So it’s not clear that there are actually more rapes of men than women, or more rapes of prisoners than non-prisoners…

According to RAINN, there are 213,000 victims of sexual assault in the United States every year.More than 9/10ths of those victims are women and girls. The numbers RAINN uses come from the Department of Justice National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). The NCVS, though, is clear that its methodology for gathering sexual assault stats is pretty limited, and probably doesn’t present a 100% accurate picture of what victims experience. The NCVS also doesn’t seem to include prisoners (at least as far as I can tell), but would include people who were sexually assaulted in prison within the past year, but were out of prison at the time the NCVS was taken.

You had better be careful in the future with your fact-checking or risk alienating your women viewers.

People on youtube tried to be all snarky and present other studies with incompatible sampling techniques to prove the amount of men that underreport rape make up the difference. They failed and then I got downvoted for simply citing statistics from the same studies they were supposedly getting their information from.

One such study is the The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey on the CDC website, which still says, “Nearly 1 in 5 women (18.3%) and 1 in 71 men (1.4%) in the United States have been raped at some time in their lives.”

Including stalking and other forms of violence bring the stats up to “More than 1 in 3 women (35.6%) and more than 1 in 4 men (28.5%) in the United States.” I still think it’s a good idea to include different forms of sexual violence, but if they broaden the definition too wide, example “stalking,” the statistics are going to include a bunch of unrelated experiences.

Prison rape is still a problem. Male and female rape are still problems. But we need to have honest conversations about the data and where it’s coming from if we’re going to fix it.

For more information on modern masculinity check out The Good Men Project.